Over the past decade, two novel approaches to resolving corporate criminal investigations have developed: the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) and Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The next few Insights will include some observations about these alternative resolutions to corporate criminal investigations and prosecutions, beginning today with a discussion of some basics.
A DPA is a voluntary alternative to adjudication in which a prosecutor agrees to grant amnesty in exchange for the defendant agreeing to fulfill certain requirements. An NPA operates in the same way, only the agreement takes place before criminal charges have been formally brought against the defendant. A case of corporate fraud, for instance, might be settled by means of a DPA in which the defendant agrees to pay fines, implement corporate reforms, and fully cooperate with the investigation. Fulfillment of the specified requirements will then result in dismissal of the charges.
The U.S. Department of Justice has been deploying DPAs and NPAs aggressively. The last 18 months or so have left no doubt that such resolutions are a vital part of the federal corporate law enforcement arsenal, affording the U.S. government an avenue both to punish and reform corporations accused of wrongdoing. One senior official was recently quoted stating that these types of settlements can be “a more powerful tool than actually going to trial.” The general goal of the prosecution is to require companies to implement an effective compliance program.
Department of Justice policy instructs prosecutors to enter into a DPA or NPA in circumstances “where the collateral consequences of a corporate conviction for innocent third parties would be significant.” Such agreements are designed to allow the company to remain in business, so as to preserve jobs and shareholder value, and increase the likelihood that victims will receive prompt restitution. The government seeks to achieve general and specific deterrence typically by requiring substantial changes to the company’s governance and operations, requiring regular reports on the progress of those reforms from a compliance monitor or the company itself, and reserving the power to revive criminal charges if the company is deemed to be noncompliant.
Generally, these agreements will include the following terms:
Conservation Group Signs $8M Deal To Buy The Point On Topsail Island
Audrey Elsberry
-
Mar 26, 2024
|
|
Rezoning Could Bring 123 Townhomes To Growing Leland Corridor
Emma Dill
-
Mar 25, 2024
|
|
N.C. Ports Officials React To Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Audrey Elsberry
-
Mar 26, 2024
|
|
Engineering Firm Hires Four Employees
Staff Reports
-
Mar 26, 2024
|
|
National Organization Bestows Top Award On Cape Fear Professional Women In Building
Staff Reports
-
Mar 26, 2024
|
A shortage of cybersecurity professionals influenced professor Ulku Clark and her team to slowly evolve UNCW’s offerings to now include eigh...
As John Willse and Beth Guertin, owners of Wilmington Wine bottle shop and now the recently opened Creative Tastings restaurant on Castle St...
Pender County Realtors recently shared updates about the coastal market at an event hosted by the Wilmington-Cape Fear Home Builders Associa...
The 2024 WilmingtonBiz: Book on Business is an annual publication showcasing the Wilmington region as a center of business.