Follow Patrick Linkedin Twitter Facebook
Email Patrick Email
Legal Issues
Aug 15, 2015

Deferred Prosecution Agreements And Non-Prosecution Agreements

Sponsored Content provided by Patrick Mincey - Criminal Defense Attorney, Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog LLP

Over the past decade, two novel approaches to resolving corporate criminal investigations have developed: the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) and Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).  The next few Insights will include some observations about these alternative resolutions to corporate criminal investigations and prosecutions, beginning today with a discussion of some basics.
A DPA is a voluntary alternative to adjudication in which a prosecutor agrees to grant amnesty in exchange for the defendant agreeing to fulfill certain requirements. An NPA operates in the same way, only the agreement takes place before criminal charges have been formally brought against the defendant. A case of corporate fraud, for instance, might be settled by means of a DPA in which the defendant agrees to pay fines, implement corporate reforms, and fully cooperate with the investigation. Fulfillment of the specified requirements will then result in dismissal of the charges.
The U.S. Department of Justice has been deploying DPAs and NPAs aggressively. The last 18 months or so have left no doubt that such resolutions are a vital part of the federal corporate law enforcement arsenal, affording the U.S. government an avenue both to punish and reform corporations accused of wrongdoing. One senior official was recently quoted stating that these types of settlements can be “a more powerful tool than actually going to trial.” The general goal of the prosecution is to require companies to implement an effective compliance program.
Department of Justice policy instructs prosecutors to enter into a DPA or NPA in circumstances “where the collateral consequences of a corporate conviction for innocent third parties would be significant.” Such agreements are designed to allow the company to remain in business, so as to preserve jobs and shareholder value, and increase the likelihood that victims will receive prompt restitution. The government seeks to achieve general and specific deterrence typically by requiring substantial changes to the company’s governance and operations, requiring regular reports on the progress of those reforms from a compliance monitor or the company itself, and reserving the power to revive criminal charges if the company is deemed to be noncompliant.
Generally, these agreements will include the following terms:

  • Acceptance of a statement of facts describing illegal acts and/or an admission of wrongdoing;
  • Agreement that the company, its employees, and agents will not publicly contradict the statement of facts;
  • Cooperation with the government for the duration of the agreement, including the provision of documents and efforts to secure employee testimony;
  • Remedial efforts such as the enhancement of compliance programs, a corporate integrity agreement, and/or monitorship;
  • Fines and penalties;
  • Obligation to report future violations of the law;
  • Waiver of the statute of limitations; and
  • Acknowledgement that the government has sole discretion to determine whether the agreement has been breached, and upon breach, the agreed statement of facts shall be admissible in a prosecution of the company.
Such agreements impose burdens and have collateral consequences of which companies should be wary. We’ll discuss those considerations in my next Insights.   
Patrick Mincey is a trial lawyer in Wilmington, where he founded the Criminal Defense Group at Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog LLP. His criminal practice ranges from representing individuals and corporate clients who are targets, subjects or witnesses in federal and state white collar proceedings to “blue collar” defendants charged with murder, drug conspiracies and assaults. To contact Patrick Mincey, call (910) 777-6017 or email him at [email protected].  

Wbj insights revised 0510 61715110749
Ico insights


Susan 2 april242017

Realism, Preparation and Teamwork: Olympic Lessons for Investors

Susan Willett - Old North State Trust, LLC

Non-profit or Social Enterprise: Why it Matters

Diane Durance - UNCW Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship

What are We Selling?

Sabrina Davis - Port City Signs & Graphics

Trending News

ILM Set To Get New Jet Bridge, Readies For United

Christina Haley O'Neal - Mar 21, 2018

Washington NC-based Meal Prep Service Opens Wilmington Location

Jessica Maurer - Mar 21, 2018

Open Air Dining And Drinks At Cloud 9 Rooftop Bar

Jessica Maurer - Mar 21, 2018

Nori Asian Fusion & Sushi Bar Now Open At The Pointe At Barclay

Jessica Maurer - Mar 21, 2018

GE Aviation Invested $36M In Wilmington Last Year

Christina Haley O'Neal - Mar 20, 2018

In The Current Issue

Partnership Aims To Speed, Enhance NCino Services

The firm announced that it is teaming up with Enforce LLC, a San Francisco-based consulting firm specializing in the implementation of cloud...

Pender Gears Up For Expected Growth

Brunswick County may be the No. 1 population growth leader in the region, but nearby Pender County is not far behind, and the county's rapid...

Realtors Seek To Dive Into Global Market

Billions of foreign dollars were invested in the nation’s real estate last year, and Cape Fear Realtors are looking to bring more of that in...

Book On Business

The 2018 WilmingtonBiz: Book on Business is an annual publication showcasing the Wilmington region as a center of business.

Order Your Copy Today!



WilmingtonBiz Expo - Keynote Lunch with John Gizdic, CEO, New Hanover Regional Medical Center
Wilmington's Most Intriguing People of 2017
2017 Health Care Heroes